Comment, Featured Posts

Is lowering the voting age a wise decision?

The terms of the Scottish referendum for 2014 recently signed by SNP leader Alex Salmond and Prime Minister David Cameron permit those from the age of 16 to vote in a move that reignites the debate of extending the franchise to 16 and 17 year olds. In a move driven by cynicism rather than a desire to extend democracy, the SNP hope to achieve much needed support amongst younger voters who are more inclined to consider giving them their vote.

Is lowering the voting age a wise decision

Advocates of votes for 16 commonly put forward the argument that a 16-year-olds’ ability to successfully complete a GCSE course shows they have shown the maturity to vote. This is a very poor analogy. To sit GCSEs students were provided with two years education to be able to make informed decisions. Whereas, 16-year-olds receive no educational assistance concerning voting.

For the issue to become a serious possibility, it is contingent upon education. Introducing the basis of political education at lower school by teaching core party history and policy will foster a sense of political consciousness amongst the young. Its absence breeds apathy which goes far in accounting for the poor voter turnout amongst younger voters. Without this introduction to politics at a younger age, a consciousness or sense that politics matters will only develop when electors understand the force of government policies on their lives after leaving the sheltered life of schooling.

Unsurprisingly, only 44% of those aged 18-24 voted in the 2010 general election. Extending the franchise to 16 and 17 year olds will only exacerbate an already worrying statistic. Needless to say, a poorer turnout will damage a government’s mandate to implement its manifesto commitments.

The future extension of the franchise to those aged 16 and 17 for Westminster elections could hinge on the opportunity that Scottish 16 and 17-year-olds have been given to vote in the Scottish referendum. Labour leader Ed Miliband as an advocate for votes for 16 may very well use this Scottish ‘case study’ to further his case in the future; whether as a policy in opposition or in office.

23/10/2012

About Author

andrewansell



Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/wp_35pmrq/concrete-online.co.uk/wp-content/themes/citynews/tpl/tpl-related-posts.php on line 11

Notice: Trying to access array offset on value of type null in /home/wp_35pmrq/concrete-online.co.uk/wp-content/themes/citynews/tpl/tpl-related-posts.php on line 26

ONE COMMENT ON THIS POST To “Is lowering the voting age a wise decision?”

  1. It’d be a daft decision to let under 18’s vote. There’d be a huge rise in voting for extreme parties thanks to easily influenced teenagers. The majority of under 18’s have absolutely no clue when it comes to politics. At least a bit of work related experience might give them more perspective on the vote. It’s not an issue.

Calendar
October 2021
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Latest Comments
About Us

The University of East Anglia’s official student newspaper. Concrete is in print and online.

If you would like to get in touch, email the Editor on Concrete.Editor@uea.ac.uk. Follow us at @ConcreteUEA.